If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Parents who don't monitor their children on the internet
Is it considered irony when someone on an internet forum makes a post that can be considered to look like it was written by a 3rd grade dropout, and they are poking fun of the fact that another person couldn't spell?
While I agree that it would be nice if parents monitored their children more closely on the internet (this would help to cut back on the oversexualization of children), I do think there are far bigger demons out there on the big wide 'net than a Facebook app.
I do think there are far bigger demons out there on the big wide 'net than a Facebook app.
So, where do you draw the line, then?
It may be just a Facebook app, but when do you start to become concerned about what children are being exposed to?
Also, as Kiwi pointed out, this child I am talking about really shouldn't be on Facebook to begin with.
Point to Ponder:
Is it considered irony when someone on an internet forum makes a post that can be considered to look like it was written by a 3rd grade dropout, and they are poking fun of the fact that another person couldn't spell?
I probably could talk to her mother about it, but it's awkward because I work with her and her fiance.
If she doesn't handle it well, and resents my meddling, it would be a little hard to face them every day.
I just figured I'd vent a bit about it here and possibly have a discussion about the lack of parental monitoring.
I'm sure this little girl isn't the only child whose parents don't pay attention to her internet usage.
Point to Ponder:
Is it considered irony when someone on an internet forum makes a post that can be considered to look like it was written by a 3rd grade dropout, and they are poking fun of the fact that another person couldn't spell?
People under college age should be on facebook, let alone such a young age. Keep the drama off of it.
Violence has resolved more conflicts than anything else. The contrary opinion that violence doesn't solve anything is merely wishful thinking at its worst. - Starship Troopers
People under college age should be on facebook, let alone such a young age. Keep the drama off of it.
Agreed. I mean, yeah, my younger cousins are on facebook (however, they are very closely monitored. Whomever they become friends with, my aunt becomes friends with. Their real birthday is not displayed.), but most of the drama comes from the people who are in high school on my face book. This is a reoccurring status:
"Like OMGZ!!!!111!!! I HATE SCHOOL! (INSERT NAME) IS SUCH A BITCH BECAUSE (INSERT ACTION). "
I kid you not.
"It's after Jeopardy, so it is my bed time."- Me when someone made a joke about how "old" I am.
As far as having a crush at age 11, I can recall my first crush. I was in kindergarten.
Certainly not a "lover" sort of deal, but as soon as you become socially aware enough to see that other people are likable you can have your first crush.
I do agree that some parents don't do a good job of stopping their kids from accessing things that are harmful, but that's often because kids are good at getting around roadblocks and not that the parents don't try to keep them from accessing things that could be harmful. Not *always* just *often*.
I do agree that some parents don't do a good job of stopping their kids from accessing things that are harmful, but that's often because kids are good at getting around roadblocks
That's true, but in this case, her mother is on Facebook and must see the app updates.
I guess if she's not concerned, why should I be?
Point to Ponder:
Is it considered irony when someone on an internet forum makes a post that can be considered to look like it was written by a 3rd grade dropout, and they are poking fun of the fact that another person couldn't spell?
That's true, but in this case, her mother is on Facebook and must see the app updates.
I guess if she's not concerned, why should I be?
Not true, you can decide in your setting who can see what, I have many LDS friend who are on lockdown my mother can't see most of my stuff either because I she would get very upset if I wouldn't "friend her" but would be even more upset if I dared post a drunken picture.
you can choose who sees what, so the mother might be clueless
maybe you should forward her the perverted justice website, that ought to scare the living shit out of her
I like your Christ. I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ - Gandhi
Personally, I'm with you in thinking that the word "lover" holds a pretty sexual connotation. However, apparently not everyone else does, as seen from earlier posts in this thread. That's not good, bad, or indifferent, just a difference in opinion. Anyway, my point is, maybe the mother just doesn't think "lover" is a sexual word so she's not bothered by it.
I gotta go with the group here. "Lover" to me not only has sexual connotation, but I see it as almost exclusively sexual. A girlfriend is someone you have a relationship with, or a wife/husband or whatever. "Lover" is just that person you sleep with on thursday night.
Comment