All right. I'm a member of a nation simulation website. Part of the appeal is that you get to act as a leader of a country. In the game, there's very little one can do 'officially' except join the World Assembly (originally the UN, but changed two years ago when the real UN issued a cease and desist order). Most of the actual gameplay is in Role-playing, controlling your 'economy' and 'military.' There are even wars that take place.
Now, most of the nations are controlled by regular people. I understand that not everyone's been in the military etc. But sometimes our RP discussions get into real-life scenarios...meaning, we start discussing tactics and operations in Iraq/Afghanistan etc. I understand people have their opinions and that's fine, but there is one member in particular that routinely lectures me on what US strategy should be, and why we're wrong, blah-blah. This coming from a guy who's never even served and isn't even American (though that's not really an issue). I just hate these people who think they know more than the Joint Chiefs just because they read Clausewitz, Sun Tzu etc and watch the History Channel religiously.
Now, most of the nations are controlled by regular people. I understand that not everyone's been in the military etc. But sometimes our RP discussions get into real-life scenarios...meaning, we start discussing tactics and operations in Iraq/Afghanistan etc. I understand people have their opinions and that's fine, but there is one member in particular that routinely lectures me on what US strategy should be, and why we're wrong, blah-blah. This coming from a guy who's never even served and isn't even American (though that's not really an issue). I just hate these people who think they know more than the Joint Chiefs just because they read Clausewitz, Sun Tzu etc and watch the History Channel religiously.
Comment