The excessive use of the word "literally" is really getting on my nerves. I guess it's a current language trend, but that makes it no less annoying. Think before you speak, sheeple! You don't need to try to use "literally" as a magnifier. If you say, "I was literally shaking with anger," it doesn't convey a stronger emotion than simply stating, "I was shaking with anger." It just makes you sound like another trendy twit.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
I'm LITERALLY tired of hearing this!
Collapse
X
-
As an intensifier, yes, but the example in the first post isn't that, necessarily. At least, if I were to say "I was literally shaking with anger," I'd mean I was *literally* shaking with anger, as opposed to using "shaking with" figuratively to express how angry I was."My in-laws are country people and at night you can hear their distinctive howl."
Comment
-
"Shaking with anger" could possibly be interpreted as just a metaphor, so I don't really mind "literally" being used as a qualifier in that example.
It's not Pulitzer Prize-winning writing, but I disagree that it makes the writer sound like a "twit".
"Literally bored to death" is a better example of what bothers people, I think.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lachrymose View Post
I tip my hat to you.Toilet Paper has been "bath tissue" for the longest time, and it really chaps my ass - Blas
I AM THE MAN of the house! I wear the pants!!! But uh...my wife buys the pants so....yeah.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Red Panda View PostMisusing literally is almost as annoying as people who say sheeple.Violence has resolved more conflicts than anything else. The contrary opinion that violence doesn't solve anything is merely wishful thinking at its worst. - Starship Troopers
Comment
-
Originally posted by Antipsych View PostThe excessive use of the word "literally" is really getting on my nerves. I guess it's a current language trend, but that makes it no less annoying. Think before you speak, sheeple! You don't need to try to use "literally" as a magnifier. If you say, "I was literally shaking with anger," it doesn't convey a stronger emotion than simply stating, "I was shaking with anger." It just makes you sound like another trendy twit.
Everyone has at least one word like that.
And I agree, it is overused and frequently misused.
Your example however isn't a good one. "Shaking with anger" could be figurative. Literally doing so states that you were actually doing it.
But flip side..."actually", "really", etc also work and I like to use words as little as possible. So I'll use Literally, but will alternate it with other similar words to keep from repeating myself.
"Literally bored to death" is obviously a misuse since if that literally happened, how in the hell did they pass on the story in the first place.
Besides. Everyone knows that the real evil here is not one overused word. It's texting and the text speak.
Well that was MHO. KTHXBYE!“There are worlds out there where the sky is burning, where the sea's asleep and the rivers dream, people made of smoke and cities made of song. Somewhere there's danger, somewhere there's injustice and somewhere else the tea is getting cold. Come on, Ace, we've got work to do.” - Sylvester McCoy as the Seventh Doctor.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Boozy View Post"Shaking with anger" could possibly be interpreted as just a metaphor, so I don't really mind "literally" being used as a qualifier in that example.
It's not Pulitzer Prize-winning writing, but I disagree that it makes the writer sound like a "twit".
Comment
Comment