You guys are still jumping to conclusions. It's blowing my mind.
You have no idea what he actually did to get his record. Look, I'm not defending pedophilia but you don't even have a clue as to what happened. Indecency with a child? You know everyone under 18 is considered a child, right? He could have just been with a girl a few years younger than him. It's like statutory rape. A 40 year old having sex with a 17 year old is statutory rape. A 18 year old having sex with a 17 year old is statutory rape. Only one was actually wrong. But hey, you hear he committed a crime and there's definitely only one possible side to it: he's a scumbag!
You have no idea what he actually did to get his record. Look, I'm not defending pedophilia but you don't even have a clue as to what happened. Indecency with a child? You know everyone under 18 is considered a child, right? He could have just been with a girl a few years younger than him. It's like statutory rape. A 40 year old having sex with a 17 year old is statutory rape. A 18 year old having sex with a 17 year old is statutory rape. Only one was actually wrong. But hey, you hear he committed a crime and there's definitely only one possible side to it: he's a scumbag!
Comment