Tweet
I don't see anything wrong with naked-baby pics. At some undefinable point between baby and young child (circa 4 or 5), it goes from 'perfectly fine' to 'uh, no' for me. I couldn't say exactly where that point is, however.
I also don't see anything wrong with baby (or child) covered-in-substance pics - depending on the substance.
My nephew, with chocolate icing all over his hands and face, standing proudly in his grandmother's kitchen, with iced (sort of) cupcakes in front of him? Perfectly fine. Rather funny, actually. (And yes, he was clothed. His clothes had to be soaked to get the icing out of them.)
Baby-covered-in-poo or baby-covered-in-blood? Not fine. Except for private photo albums, or in tragic cases, evidence lockers.
I also don't see anything wrong with baby (or child) covered-in-substance pics - depending on the substance.
My nephew, with chocolate icing all over his hands and face, standing proudly in his grandmother's kitchen, with iced (sort of) cupcakes in front of him? Perfectly fine. Rather funny, actually. (And yes, he was clothed. His clothes had to be soaked to get the icing out of them.)
Baby-covered-in-poo or baby-covered-in-blood? Not fine. Except for private photo albums, or in tragic cases, evidence lockers.
Comment