against people who are stuck on arguing how things are. You can make several good arguments for your case, but all these people will do is say "but the law says this" or "the bible says that". Never mind that you're arguing against what is written in the first place, you're automatically wrong.
Just as an example, I don't think anyone should be arrested for doing drugs. They're only hurting themselves and I don't see how looking them up is going to help them at all. If someone can prove me wrong with some logical reasons why drug users need to be locked up, fine. But don't tell me what I already know. I know it's the law. Cite legal sources till you're blue in the face, but that does nothing to justify the reasoning behind it.
I know I wouldn't be able to argue my way out of the police if I clearly broke a law, but I'm not talking about that. I'm talking about openly debating the purpose of said law. I'm not saying all laws or everything that is written is BS, but it's not perfect either. If we can't come with with reasons why we should follow these laws and just blindly accept, than how are we going to move foward?
Just as an example, I don't think anyone should be arrested for doing drugs. They're only hurting themselves and I don't see how looking them up is going to help them at all. If someone can prove me wrong with some logical reasons why drug users need to be locked up, fine. But don't tell me what I already know. I know it's the law. Cite legal sources till you're blue in the face, but that does nothing to justify the reasoning behind it.
I know I wouldn't be able to argue my way out of the police if I clearly broke a law, but I'm not talking about that. I'm talking about openly debating the purpose of said law. I'm not saying all laws or everything that is written is BS, but it's not perfect either. If we can't come with with reasons why we should follow these laws and just blindly accept, than how are we going to move foward?
Comment