This is something I see a lot on debate boards, and it annoys me. Not as much here, but it still annoys me. Someone makes a big post, that goes something like
Then someone replies with
Refutation of point!
Repeat refutation!
I already proved you wrong twice, why are you still arguing this?
This really annoys me. They're 'still' arguing this because their timeline doesn't match up to yours. See, unlike a face to face conversation, if you're refuting one post, they can't have changed that post in light of your refutation until AFTER they read what you've just posted.
Its a smug asshole move that really annoys me when I see it. Was watching "Screw Loose Change", a refutation of a the 9/11 truther documentary "Loose Change" and the guy keeps seeming to expect Loose Change to conform to his arguments. He mocks them when they keep on a point after he's disproved it.
For the record, I think what we know about 9/11 is what actually happened. There may be something we don't know, but if there is, its probably details, nothing as big or sinister as Loose Change implies. Loose Change is a really crappy documentary, but even the world's greatest documentarians can't change their videos in response to you WHILE YOU ANALYZE THEM.
Sorry, that's just a thing that pisses me off.
Point. Elaboration on point. Double elaboration.
*Point
Elaboration on point
Double elaboration
This really annoys me. They're 'still' arguing this because their timeline doesn't match up to yours. See, unlike a face to face conversation, if you're refuting one post, they can't have changed that post in light of your refutation until AFTER they read what you've just posted.
Its a smug asshole move that really annoys me when I see it. Was watching "Screw Loose Change", a refutation of a the 9/11 truther documentary "Loose Change" and the guy keeps seeming to expect Loose Change to conform to his arguments. He mocks them when they keep on a point after he's disproved it.
For the record, I think what we know about 9/11 is what actually happened. There may be something we don't know, but if there is, its probably details, nothing as big or sinister as Loose Change implies. Loose Change is a really crappy documentary, but even the world's greatest documentarians can't change their videos in response to you WHILE YOU ANALYZE THEM.
Sorry, that's just a thing that pisses me off.
Comment