Swearing

[RecoveringKinkoid]

Seriously? Have you honestly skipped over my posts? I was using that AS AN EXAMPLE.

E-X-A-M-P-L-E. I've explained this. I'm not claiming I don't have time to read the posts.

I'm saying it's not ok for one person to say they don't have time to read, but then to expect me to read everything.

Got it? Can I make it any more clear? Cuz I'm getting tired of people once again misreading everything I write and then changing the subject and whatever else is going on. It's getting old.

But again to clarify...

I'm not claiming I don't have time to read the posts.

I'm saying it's not ok for one person to say they don't have time to read, but then to expect me to read everything.

Because you got all defensive when it was suggested you hadn't. And you'd have had a right to get defensive if you'd been accused of not reading something you had.

And because I'm curious at this point.

You didn't. Did you.

[DrFaroohk]

Because you got all defensive when it was suggested you hadn't. And you'd have had a right to get defensive if you'd been accused of not reading something you had.

And because I'm curious at this point.

You didn't. Did you.

It is irrelevant to the discussion and I choose to keep the answer a mystery. What if I said I read them TWICE? Does that make a difference?

Of course it doesn't, because whether or not I read them does not change what the rules are. Nor does it change anyone else's obligation to follow them.

[Andara Bledin]

It is irrelevant to the discussion...

No, it isn't.

You're claiming that you're being required to do something that someone else isn't, following the rules, and yet one of the rules is actually reading the rules themselves, so are you actually even following the most basic of them in the first place?

Or is your anger just a lot of hot air because you got caught not following the rules and now you want to throw a tantrum because you think other people got away with it?

^-.-^

[Rapscallion]

It is irrelevant to the discussion and I choose to keep the answer a mystery. What if I said I read them TWICE? Does that make a difference?

Yes, yes it does. It displays intent. If you had read them, you'd have been deliberately breaking them. If you hadn't then it's perhaps understandable that you didn't know what to follow. We tend to allow some leeway to brand new members on the forums I run.

What I get from this discussion, though, is the impression that you were out for a fight and got one, and didn't like the result.

Rapscallion

[RecoveringKinkoid]

Oh, make no mistake. There's no mystery. There never was.

It could not be more relevant to the issue. In fact, it changes the entire slant of the discussion.

You're trying to spin the situation as if you're the guy following the rules and still getting unfairly picked on while the rest of the board runs riot. You're trying to lead us to believe that the unfairness is that you're being held to a standard no one else is being held to by unfair moderators.

What it would seem is closer to the truth is that the only unfairness is coming from you. You're demanding that everyone ELSE read the rules that you have decided are beneath you. You are lamenting the fact that you are being treated EXACTLY like everyone else...ie, not being forced to read the rules nobody else is reading anyways. According to you, everyone else should read the rules, and the mods need to read every word of every post...but you shouldn't have to read anything because "you don't have time."

And here you are publicly airing this over the top deluded entitlement around and wondering why some people have a problem with you.

Listen. If I smack myself with a hammer, and it hurts, I find a new way to drive a nail. I don't keep whacking away while wondering why my thumb hurts. I'm just sayin'.

[Peppergirl]

It is irrelevant to the discussion and I choose to keep the answer a mystery. What if I said I read them TWICE? Does that make a difference?

Why would you start all of this on a DEBATE site, then? Isn't that why we're here?

[DrFaroohk]

Oh, make no mistake. There's no mystery. There never was.

No mystery at all? So you must be pretty sure of your answer....

What it would seem is closer to the truth is that the only unfairness is coming from you. You're demanding that everyone ELSE read the rules that you have decided are beneath you.

Really? I said that somewhere? I don't see it. Would you kindly copy n paste the section where I said "You all have to read the rules but I don't!" I really don't remember writing that out anywhere.

According to you, everyone else should read the rules, and the mods need to read every word of every post...but you shouldn't have to read anything because "you don't have time."

Why do we keep making things up? I never said anything remotely resembling that. Again, cut n paste is your friend. I'd love to see this. This is a pointless discussion if you're just going to keep throwing around random bullshit and hoping some of it sticks.

And here you are publicly airing this over the top deluded entitlement around and wondering why some people have a problem with you.

Deluded entitlement? Wha...? You mean because I expect people to not dick me around means I feel ENTITLED? Wow. I guess we have a whole lot of overly entitled people in the world. Some people feel entitled to have the same right to get married, goddamn them! How can they be so ENTITLED? Some people feel entitled to not be raped. The AUDACITY!

/sarcasm

One last quote...

Yes, yes it does. It displays intent. If you had read them, you'd have been deliberately breaking them.

I think it's been made pretty clear in many posts that the intent doesn't matter. Why does it suddenly matter when it applies to me? And what makes everyone so sure of their answer?

[protege]

I think it's been made pretty clear in many posts that the intent doesn't matter. Why does it suddenly matter when it applies to me? And what makes everyone so sure of their answer?

Because of things like this:

I just don't consider "bucking" authority to be that bad. It's one of those things you just have to deal with if you want to be in power. You left a loophole, I took advantage of it. Get over it.

1. You admit that you go around looking for loopholes to abuse...and then cop an attitude when caught. That's exactly why you get "picked on" and why you get so much attention from other members. Don't want the increased scrutiny of your posts? Then follow the rules of the forum.

2. Aren't you the same guy who constantly goes on about his child bucking authority? Why is it OK for *you* to do it but not your child? Oh, right...

My right to not be dicked around with transcends all legal and governmental rights. That's just how it is. Everyone else has that same right. Don't screw with people.

See a problem with this? You admit to bucking authority. You claim you have a "right not to be dicked around with. Then you go on to say that "everyone else has that same right." If you're bucking authority...aren't you 'dicking around' with someone...and violating *their* right? Call me crazy, but aren't these statements contradictory?

[DrFaroohk]

1. You admit that you go around looking for loopholes to abuse...and then cop an attitude when caught. That's exactly why you get "picked on" and why you get so much attention from other members. Don't want the increased scrutiny of your posts? Then follow the rules of the forum.

Loopholes does not equal breaking the rules. It's IN THE RULES. There's also a certain give or take attitude. If you're gonna be a stickler for the rules, so am I. Ease up a bit, and so will I.

2. Aren't you the same guy who constantly goes on about his child bucking authority? Why is it OK for *you* to do it but not your child? Oh, right...

Applies and oranges much? With the child, it's like this: Me: Stop yelling. Child: /yell

That's just outright disobediance. but when I told him he could have a turn with the TV after his sister wakes up from her nap, and he proceeds to immediately be loud to wake up her, guess what that's my own fault because I wasn't clear. I never said "don't wake your sister up right now" so it's my fault. I don't go blaming him because I such at making rules.

See a problem with this? You admit to bucking authority. You claim you have a "right not to be dicked around with. Then you go on to say that "everyone else has that same right." If you're bucking authority...aren't you 'dicking around' with someone...and violating *their* right? Call me crazy, but aren't these statements contradictory?

Yes, I have a right to not be dicked with. Being dicked with is many of the things I've mentioned such as singling out one person, or framing someone for something they didn't do. I have the right to not have this happen. So do you.

Staying within the bounds of the rules and even looking for loopholes does NOT constitute dicking with someone. It happens every day. It's part of life.

[Andara Bledin]

Staying within the bounds of the rules and even looking for loopholes does NOT constitute dicking with someone.

Looking for loopholes is dicking around.

The fact that you seem to think otherwise is likely why people choose you to make an example of, as you claim.

^-.-^

[Evandril]

but when I told him he could have a turn with the TV after his sister wakes up from her nap, and he proceeds to immediately be loud to wake up her, guess what that's my own fault because I wasn't clear. I never said "don't wake your sister up right now" so it's my fault. I don't go blaming him because I such at making rules.

I'm betting you watched what he was doing more carefully, and if he had no punishment for doing something common sense should tell you not to...Then I don't agree with your parenting style. My kids are *very* good (as was I) at getting around the spirit of the law, while staying within the letter of it...and have been taught to display common sense

Yes, I have a right to not be dicked with. Being dicked with is many of the things I've mentioned such as singling out one person, or framing someone for something they didn't do. I have the right to not have this happen. So do you.

Staying within the bounds of the rules and even looking for loopholes does NOT constitute dicking with someone. It happens every day. It's part of life.

I hate to tell you...but being dicked with *IS* a part of life, admittedly a sucky one. Boards like CS wouldn't exist, otherwise, nor would everyone have various stories of how they were treated unfairly. I'd seriously love to know where the right to not have this happen is.

At one point near the start of this thread, you'd stated

Originally Posted by DrFaroohk
Did it ever occur to some mods that not everyone has time to read through a long, drawn out TOS or forum rules post? No, of course not. They assume everyone wants to sit down and read it. Oh, wait, are youi saying it's my responsibility to read the TOS? Just like it's the mods responsibility to do their job and read the effing posts.

Which, while *not* stating you didn't read the TOS...it does imply it...and it does compare reading a mostly static document with reading the entirety of a changing message board...Which is an invalid comparison.