Tweet
I get sick of bloggers that act like they are just as good as journalists but have no journalistic integrity.
They can and will use every dirty trick in the book to get you to agree with the way they see things regardless of what the truth is. For example they will do the following.
They will say, "Now the report said the boy was neither running faster or slower than the other boys. This is misleading because of our poor educational system let me parse this out for you into two sentences as it should be which is indicated by the word or,
The boy was not running slower than the boys
The boy was not running faster than the boys
What this means is the boy had no limits on his running he was faster than the other boys in fact he is the fastest boy on the planet"
Of course the point made is the one we are supposed to agree with and we are supposed to conveniently forget the qualifier that makes it clear there was no movement to either end of the speed spectrum for the boy and that obviously the boy was running about the same speed as the other boys.
This is the kind of dirty trick that with the advent of the internet means listening to hundreds of thousands of people misinterpret something based on a biased and blatantly false interpretation put forth by people whom have it in their own best interests to do so.
They can and will use every dirty trick in the book to get you to agree with the way they see things regardless of what the truth is. For example they will do the following.
They will say, "Now the report said the boy was neither running faster or slower than the other boys. This is misleading because of our poor educational system let me parse this out for you into two sentences as it should be which is indicated by the word or,
The boy was not running slower than the boys
The boy was not running faster than the boys
What this means is the boy had no limits on his running he was faster than the other boys in fact he is the fastest boy on the planet"
Of course the point made is the one we are supposed to agree with and we are supposed to conveniently forget the qualifier that makes it clear there was no movement to either end of the speed spectrum for the boy and that obviously the boy was running about the same speed as the other boys.
This is the kind of dirty trick that with the advent of the internet means listening to hundreds of thousands of people misinterpret something based on a biased and blatantly false interpretation put forth by people whom have it in their own best interests to do so.