Why is it that most analogies people use are complete bullshit?
Example: I read this blog where some nutcase wanted to establish a theocracy. He said that belief equals fact because "we believe the sky is blue because it is". Never mind that you can actually point to the sky and say "it's blue". We can't point to a God and say "so and so religion is 100% true". If we could, things would be much much easier.
Another example: Bill O'reilly comparing contraceptives to his football practice, claiming that they should both be paid for by insurance. Such an obvious apples and oranges comparison that I don't even know how to respond to it.
And another one: Comparing homosexuality to pedophilia. One is between two consenting adults, the other is between an adult and a non consenting child. One hurts the other person, the other does not. There is really no comparison here.
I could write a whole book of all the dumb analogies I've heard. Granted, not all analogies are bad as some do point a realistic picture, but a lot of them are so manipulative. It's like they're 12 year olds who took their first logic class and are trying to argue a certain position they don't even understand. What's terrifying is that some of these people are in politics or have their own show (Bill O'reilly). No wonder so many people buy into these.
Example: I read this blog where some nutcase wanted to establish a theocracy. He said that belief equals fact because "we believe the sky is blue because it is". Never mind that you can actually point to the sky and say "it's blue". We can't point to a God and say "so and so religion is 100% true". If we could, things would be much much easier.
Another example: Bill O'reilly comparing contraceptives to his football practice, claiming that they should both be paid for by insurance. Such an obvious apples and oranges comparison that I don't even know how to respond to it.
And another one: Comparing homosexuality to pedophilia. One is between two consenting adults, the other is between an adult and a non consenting child. One hurts the other person, the other does not. There is really no comparison here.
I could write a whole book of all the dumb analogies I've heard. Granted, not all analogies are bad as some do point a realistic picture, but a lot of them are so manipulative. It's like they're 12 year olds who took their first logic class and are trying to argue a certain position they don't even understand. What's terrifying is that some of these people are in politics or have their own show (Bill O'reilly). No wonder so many people buy into these.
Comment