The media going too far for a story

[daleduke17]

Why are you trying to fob this one off on the Illuminati (who, unlikely as it sounds, were NOT involved in THIS incident)? Is it to divert blame from the Masons?

The Illuminati and the Masons decided it was too big of a task to go alone, so they teamed up.

[blas87]

Not trying to derail the conversation from the original couple being discussed, but it doesn't help that there are famous people out there who are huge attention whores and will do/say/wear anything for attention, so that could explain why so many of those idiot stalkerazzis have no qualms about stalking any celeb in general, whether they are fame whores like the Kardashians or ones who prefer to have their own privacy and be left alone.

[Andara Bledin]

Hey, if people are doing that crap out in public, then fine, let people take pics.

But when you have to use a long-view telephoto lens because you're over 800 meters away and can't actually see anything with the naked eye, that's going way too far.

And article at the Daily Mail that includes a naked eye view from the place where the shots were taken.

^-.-^

[crashhelmet]

It amazes me there aren't more laws specifically against these rectal parasites yet. Especially in the wake of Diana.

Even if you don't do it for morale reasons. Do you know how much money you could make as a celebrity tourist destination if you could bill your city/country a paparazzi free zone? -.-

if i remember right, they have tried getting the laws passed, but they've been trumped by money hiding under the guise of "Freedom of the press" and "freedom of speech"

[Sarah Valentine]

I've read some of the comments, not a lot of people Sarah Ferguson or Kate do they?

[Greenday]

if i remember right, they have tried getting the laws passed, but they've been trumped by money hiding under the guise of "Freedom of the press" and "freedom of speech"

I wasn't aware Freedom of the Press and Freedom of Speech protect stalking and invasion of privacy.

[crashhelmet]

I wasn't aware Freedom of the Press and Freedom of Speech protect stalking and invasion of privacy.

I wasn't aware Freedom of Speech covered donating large sums of money either, until Citizens United came along

[HYHYBT]

I'm pretty sure Citizens United applies neither in France nor in Britain...

I've read some of the comments, not a lot of people Sarah Ferguson or Kate do they?

How do you go about Sarah Fergusoning or Kating? (Written facetiously, but I really don't know what the original was intended to mean.)

[crashhelmet]

I'm pretty sure Citizens United applies neither in France nor in Britain...

How do you go about Sarah Fergusoning or Kating? (Written facetiously, but I really don't know what the original was intended to mean.)

No, it doesn't apply in either of those locations. I never stated or insinuated that it did either.

The fact remains that people have tried to sue the paparazzi and tabloids here in the US and lost on the grounds of freedoms of speech and of the press, granted by the 1st Amendment.

Greenday commented that he didn't know it applied to stalking and invasion of privacy. I was pointing out that I didn't know it applied to donating money either, until Citizens United came along.

[Ree]

How do you go about Sarah Fergusoning or Kating? (Written facetiously, but I really don't know what the original was intended to mean.)

Well, if I was to use logic and guess, I am thinking she missed typing the word "like".

[Sarah Valentine]

Well, if I was to use logic and guess, I am thinking she missed typing the word "like".

*looks back at post* Yeah, I missed putting in the word like.