In light of trends of FB I'm really getting sick of heated arguments that go like this
Person 1 makes a FB post of an image stating one thing.
Person 2 posts a quarter page tearing into them but uses a shit-ton of inaccurate facts and non-sense.
{Most of these person 2 people are self proclaimed (SUBJECT) experts having participated in (Activity based on subject) one time in their life. Or will cite being the child or significant other of someone who is extremely knowledgeable with (SUBJECT), but fails to link how someone else’s hobby that they don't participate in frequently makes them an expert as well. }
Person 1 points out mistakes and misconceptions to them and wants and have a discussion with opposing viewpoint. Along with asking them a few questions on experience with subject to gauge actual knowledge.
Person 2 responds by spouting even more inaccuracies and non-sense but end the post stated lets agree to disagree and if you respond to their half of a typed page response that took them over an hour to make up.... YOU get told "See above this is done I’m not even reading your response"
Why instead of person 2 responding after person 1 makes a reply to the arguement with a long response that is clearly meant to attack or annoy does person 2 frequently go "THIS IS OVER!" ......
How about instead person 2 goes. "Lets agree to disagree" and leaves it at that no extra points thrown in or maybe actually try a discussion and then give up on each other.
Person 1 makes a FB post of an image stating one thing.
Person 2 posts a quarter page tearing into them but uses a shit-ton of inaccurate facts and non-sense.
{Most of these person 2 people are self proclaimed (SUBJECT) experts having participated in (Activity based on subject) one time in their life. Or will cite being the child or significant other of someone who is extremely knowledgeable with (SUBJECT), but fails to link how someone else’s hobby that they don't participate in frequently makes them an expert as well. }
Person 1 points out mistakes and misconceptions to them and wants and have a discussion with opposing viewpoint. Along with asking them a few questions on experience with subject to gauge actual knowledge.
Person 2 responds by spouting even more inaccuracies and non-sense but end the post stated lets agree to disagree and if you respond to their half of a typed page response that took them over an hour to make up.... YOU get told "See above this is done I’m not even reading your response"
Why instead of person 2 responding after person 1 makes a reply to the arguement with a long response that is clearly meant to attack or annoy does person 2 frequently go "THIS IS OVER!" ......
How about instead person 2 goes. "Lets agree to disagree" and leaves it at that no extra points thrown in or maybe actually try a discussion and then give up on each other.
Comment