This is something I see a lot of, it's most common with Sikhs being mistaken for Muslims, but it happens an awful lot. It upsets me when people (Other than Sikhs, who are rightly concerned about their own safety) seem to emphasize not the fact that these people physically assaulted someone based on their perceived religious beliefs, but that the people were wrong about the religion.
Now, it's of course worth bringing up that, you know, that wasn't the same group. To do otherwise is to spread confusion. But I'd rather not see it made the entire point of the article so often. When I see things like these, I often feel like it's a sort of tacit acknowledgement, a backhanded defense. Like when McCain responded to someone saying "Obama's a Muslim!" With "No, he's a good family man."
Now, it's of course worth bringing up that, you know, that wasn't the same group. To do otherwise is to spread confusion. But I'd rather not see it made the entire point of the article so often. When I see things like these, I often feel like it's a sort of tacit acknowledgement, a backhanded defense. Like when McCain responded to someone saying "Obama's a Muslim!" With "No, he's a good family man."
Comment