For those who don't know, Chris Hansen is the guy on "To Catch A Preditor". He's the one who does the preditor catching, telling potential preditors "Have a seat right here". I don't have much of an opinion on the show or Hansen as I've never watched it.
But the memes that have spawned from it are annoying as all get out. When even anyone even mentions finding an actress under 18 attractive, posters respond with the "Have a seat right here" with pictures and gifs of Hansen. This is especially prominent on IMDB. Granted, sometimes this is deserved as I have read some utterly horrifying comments that make me wish brain bleach was a real thing. Other times, however, it just seems like an overreaction.
-Someone mentions they find an actress attractive.
-Turns out actress is (at most) a few years younger.
-Cue Chris Hansen memes and reactionaries wanting to castrate the poster for mentioning such.
Here's my issues in list form.
1. How do they know the poster isn't a teenage boy (or girl if they're lesbian) themselves?
2. Even if they are, the pedo label is still inaccurate. There's a specific term for finding teenagers attractive. And even if someone one finds one teenage girl attractive, it does not mean they have a preference for girls that age (That's when they hit puberty)
3. There's a fine line between finding someone attractive and wanting to get in their pants. There are a lot of women I find attractive, but they're married women and I know my bounds (of course it doesn't help that I'm shy as hell).
4. There are some states and other parts of the world where the age of consent is lower than 18 (not really sure the details though).
In addition to all that, I just think it's ridiculous how fast people jump the gun. Does knowing someone that is under 18 magically make them not attractive anymore? The laws were made to protect minors from relationships where adults would exploit them. I'm not going to argue for or against such laws (though I think they're necessary), but what I am trying to say,
FINDING SOMEONE ATTRACTIVE DOES NOT MEAN ACTUALLY BANGING THEM. To equate it as such is thought policing. However, when ever someone tries to explain this to the reactionaries on IMDB or other websites, it goes over their heads.
But the memes that have spawned from it are annoying as all get out. When even anyone even mentions finding an actress under 18 attractive, posters respond with the "Have a seat right here" with pictures and gifs of Hansen. This is especially prominent on IMDB. Granted, sometimes this is deserved as I have read some utterly horrifying comments that make me wish brain bleach was a real thing. Other times, however, it just seems like an overreaction.
-Someone mentions they find an actress attractive.
-Turns out actress is (at most) a few years younger.
-Cue Chris Hansen memes and reactionaries wanting to castrate the poster for mentioning such.
Here's my issues in list form.
1. How do they know the poster isn't a teenage boy (or girl if they're lesbian) themselves?
2. Even if they are, the pedo label is still inaccurate. There's a specific term for finding teenagers attractive. And even if someone one finds one teenage girl attractive, it does not mean they have a preference for girls that age (That's when they hit puberty)
3. There's a fine line between finding someone attractive and wanting to get in their pants. There are a lot of women I find attractive, but they're married women and I know my bounds (of course it doesn't help that I'm shy as hell).
4. There are some states and other parts of the world where the age of consent is lower than 18 (not really sure the details though).
In addition to all that, I just think it's ridiculous how fast people jump the gun. Does knowing someone that is under 18 magically make them not attractive anymore? The laws were made to protect minors from relationships where adults would exploit them. I'm not going to argue for or against such laws (though I think they're necessary), but what I am trying to say,
FINDING SOMEONE ATTRACTIVE DOES NOT MEAN ACTUALLY BANGING THEM. To equate it as such is thought policing. However, when ever someone tries to explain this to the reactionaries on IMDB or other websites, it goes over their heads.
Comment