This is a link to The Smoking Gun's article about complaints to the FCC about MTV's Video Music Awards.
I guess it was inevitable. The Federal Communications Commission (US) received numerous complaints about Miley Cyrus "twerking" on Robin Thicke on MTV's Video Music Awards show. I have six problems with these complaints:
1. MTV is a cable network, not a broadcast network.
2. The FCC has no jurisdiction over cable networks. Which means ...
3. The FCC has no jurisdiction over MTV.
4. MTV has a reputation of having trashy programming like "Teen Mom," "16 and Pregnant," and "Jersey Shore."
5. The VMA's have a reputation for having outrageous moments.
6. The VMA's was rated TV-14. MTV determined that the VMA's were not appropriate for children under 14.
For the first three points, all the FCC can do is send MTV a sternly worded letter. They can't actually punish MTV since it is not a broadcast network. For the next two points, why would you let your children watch MTV or the VMA's with their reputations. That would be like buying your kid "Playboy" and then get angry at "Playboy" for having pictures of naked women in it.
Even if you ignore, or if your ignorant, of the first five points, the sixth one is the real sticking point I have with parents. It was rated TV-14. It was a warning that the program was not appropriate for children under 14-years-old. Why would you let your children watch something that the people producing it won't let *their* children watch? That is the exact same stupidity that make parents let their children watch movies like "Saw," and play games like "Manhunt."
I guess it was inevitable. The Federal Communications Commission (US) received numerous complaints about Miley Cyrus "twerking" on Robin Thicke on MTV's Video Music Awards show. I have six problems with these complaints:
1. MTV is a cable network, not a broadcast network.
2. The FCC has no jurisdiction over cable networks. Which means ...
3. The FCC has no jurisdiction over MTV.
4. MTV has a reputation of having trashy programming like "Teen Mom," "16 and Pregnant," and "Jersey Shore."
5. The VMA's have a reputation for having outrageous moments.
6. The VMA's was rated TV-14. MTV determined that the VMA's were not appropriate for children under 14.
For the first three points, all the FCC can do is send MTV a sternly worded letter. They can't actually punish MTV since it is not a broadcast network. For the next two points, why would you let your children watch MTV or the VMA's with their reputations. That would be like buying your kid "Playboy" and then get angry at "Playboy" for having pictures of naked women in it.
Even if you ignore, or if your ignorant, of the first five points, the sixth one is the real sticking point I have with parents. It was rated TV-14. It was a warning that the program was not appropriate for children under 14-years-old. Why would you let your children watch something that the people producing it won't let *their* children watch? That is the exact same stupidity that make parents let their children watch movies like "Saw," and play games like "Manhunt."
Comment