Now, I have some friends who are what is known as Otherkin. Some of them (Like my dear Little Sister) are polite about it, and consider it just something about them. Others, though, are more... Contentious about it.
I also have a friend who despises Otherkin (I can't convince him that its just a belief and not a symptom of schizophrenia) and he insists on bringing it up. Normally, if I'm there in a chat/conversation with both of them, I tell them both to shut up, and change the topic.
This time, I told them both the shut up and change the topic, but I also had a question raised.
See, it became obvious while they were arguing that they were arguing about different things. Friend 1 was saying that Otherkin are pretentious assholes, just because they think they're someone else. Friend 2 said that that's not the case, Otherkin aren't like that, because Otherkin think they USED to be something else. Friend 1 said he was using the No True Scotsman argument because the person he'd talked to had been an Otherkin.
Here's my problem. Can he disqualify that on the basis of what he believes? Otherkin is such a loose term that really the only basis is that they claim to be Otherkin.
In short, the question I had raised was "How do you call No True Scotsman if you can't find Scotland?"
Am I being clear, or do I need to explain my question more? I can't tell...
I also have a friend who despises Otherkin (I can't convince him that its just a belief and not a symptom of schizophrenia) and he insists on bringing it up. Normally, if I'm there in a chat/conversation with both of them, I tell them both to shut up, and change the topic.
This time, I told them both the shut up and change the topic, but I also had a question raised.
See, it became obvious while they were arguing that they were arguing about different things. Friend 1 was saying that Otherkin are pretentious assholes, just because they think they're someone else. Friend 2 said that that's not the case, Otherkin aren't like that, because Otherkin think they USED to be something else. Friend 1 said he was using the No True Scotsman argument because the person he'd talked to had been an Otherkin.
Here's my problem. Can he disqualify that on the basis of what he believes? Otherkin is such a loose term that really the only basis is that they claim to be Otherkin.
In short, the question I had raised was "How do you call No True Scotsman if you can't find Scotland?"
Am I being clear, or do I need to explain my question more? I can't tell...
Comment